Literature review for research methodology - Writing the Literature Review

Am I looking at issues of theory?

Literature Review Methodology Guidelines – 4 Simple Steps that’ll Guarantee an a Grade

What is the scope of my literature review? What types of publications am I using e. What discipline am I working in e.

How good was my information seeking? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant material?

Have I critically analysed the literature I use? Do I follow through a set of concepts and questions, comparing items to each other in the ways they deal with them?

Instead of just listing and summarizing items, do I assess them, discussing strengths and weaknesses? Have I cited and discussed studies contrary to my perspective?

Literature Review in Research Methodology Tips and Tricks | Writing a Literature Review

Almost all innocent individuals exonerated by DNA evidence had been convicted primarily as a result of erroneous eyewitness evidence ref. Consequently, a great deal of research has focussed on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony refs.

Briefly reviews what has been found, and then identifies a gap. Discusses what has been found, but points out inconsistency of results.

This area has been surprisingly neglected until recently, as the majority of the literature on eyewitness testimony has focussed on the effect of questions and media reports containing misleading information. Motivates next part of literature review.

To appreciate the effects of co-witness information on eyewitness reports, we must examine, in detail, the different methodologies that have been used to investigate this topic. Further justifies the need to investigate the impact of social influences on memory. However, such a narrow focus may not fully explain how people remember ref.

They may be able to find a fresh and original research question, identify a heretofore, unknown gap in the literature or make surprising connections. By understanding how ways of thinking connect to tasks of a literature review, a scholar is able to be self-reflective and bring metacognition to the process of reviewing the literature.

The process of reviewing the research and writing a literature review can be complicated and lengthy. It is helpful to bring a methodology of organization and planning to the task. When an orderly system can be designed, it is easier to keep track of the articles, reviews, materials literature, notes, outlines and drafts.

For them, here is the for. Article by King, William R.

There are four methods in conducting literature review, i. Narrative Review, Descriptive Review, Vote Counting and Meta-Analysis.

Literature review sources

Look at the diagram at the end of this entry to view these methods in the qualitative-quantitative continuum. Meta-analysis is considered as the most rigor method; it is the one which closest to the positivist tradition.

Here are the advantages of meta-analysis: Despite the advantages listed above, it has its own limitations: The statistics that normally used and reported in IS studies are: In the literature, effects sizes are of various forms.

Look at the diagram at the end of this entry to view them.

There are two models of meta-analysis method available.