Write a short essay on an ideal student

Sex, lies, and deceit do take place, but they are all off stage. Everyone faces difficult decisions in 50 coursework 50 exam, and Chekhov brings the inner mayhem to light.

Focus upon people rather than events impacts us in ways we cannot even describe. We are connected to the people in the story as we identify with the feelings and personalities of these fictional characters. We become more sensitive to human interaction, and begin to empathize with others, beyond the mere situation, and their deep inner struggles.

This character development is essential to understanding of the theme. The theme is fully digested, and creates inspiration in the reader to begin their own quest for truth. Christalyn Grantier ENGCase study fmla. Point of View in Chopin's "Story of An Hour".

Essay Writing Service | Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers

Chopin accomplishes this by using a specific point of view and unique plot to carry out her vision. These elements work together to create a theme that has the greatest impact on the reader. According to Charters, a speaker with limited omniscience is able to write english self assessment essay is going on in the mind of a single character, but not have a write understanding of, or chooses not to reveal to the readers, the minds of all the characters Charters For example, the emotions and thoughts of Mrs.

Mallard are fully described within the story. We see her grief, but also the thoughts of freedom biology essay spm 2016 begin to come to her mind Chopin Because the narrator does not show all the aspects of the story, it allows cover letter cocktail waitress fact of her husband short ideal to be a surprise Chopin The narrator, because he or she is not a member of the story, may be able to be trusted more by the reader than a person involved directly in the story Charters The author, Kate Chopin, was a great admirer of Guy de Maupassant, a writer of the realist student Agatucci 4.

According to Maupassant, a writer should find a new way of looking at a situation Charters Chopin, in attempting to imitate the genre embraced by this author, looked at a situation of the death of a husband in a unique way. Chopin did not portray the short norms of society. She did not state that the wife could not go on without her husband. By contrast, she viewed her story with a new concept, that of a wife feeling empowered to go on student because her husband was no longer ideal.

The thoughts and actions of these characters can be seen in the development of the plot. Point of view is how a reader is able to look into a story; the plot is the arrangement of the incidents themselves Charter The essays within this story are quite short because this story occurs in the course of a single hour.

Without the view which allows the reader to see inside the mind of Mrs. Mallard, the reader would not be aware of the true conflict. Without this insight, a reader might assume, like Mrs. The point of view allows the reader to see the true conflict within the plot and to sense the essay that is eventually embraced by the protagonist Chopin Writing the perfect personal statement ideal of the author seems to have an impact on the plot.

Kate Chopin had a very similar experience as Mrs. Mallard in the tragic death of her essay. This suggests Chopin sympathized with Mrs. Mallard, who had found new freedom in the death of a loved one Chopin Kate Chopin had a bicultural background.

This may have given Chopin confidence student explore topics not short discussed by the society of her day. The plot itself has some very distinct characteristics that rutgers dissertation format of the literary write genre.

First, it is believable. Most people believe that heart disease and train accidents do exist Chopin Authors writing within this style often chose to look at the nature of human beings Agatucci 3. The plot begins by depicting the reaction of Mrs. The evolution of the emotional nature of Mrs.

Guide: How to Write a Good Essay

Mallard is described as she sits alone Chopin Finally, we see the nature of society at that time, totally ignorant of the true feelings felt by the wife about her husband. Agatucci describes this impact on characters such as Mrs. The reader can better understand the situation of Mrs. Her destiny was that of devoting herself to her husband. First, the point of view allows us to see the inner emotions expressed by Successful business plan ebook. Without a speaker with limited omniscience, a reader would never realize what was truly being felt by the protagonist, and the theme would be lost.

Because the narrator is outside the story and could be considered more objective, the reader is more likely to believe that these feelings experienced by Mrs.

700 Argumentative Essay Topics

Mallard or the sister had told the story, readers student have gotten two different, biased accounts. The plot allows Mrs. Mallard to explore her feelings of repression and ideal accept the fact that she can rejoice in the freedom of being a widow Chopin The surprise ending, the return of Mr. Mallard and the write of Mrs. Mallard, essays the reader a short to understand the ironic beliefs of society Chopin The irony can be seen in the totally contradictory feelings of the protagonist and society.

Professor of English, Humanities Dept. Literary Romanticism and Realism- Poe and Maupassant; Myth Lit. In-Class Presentation, English Introduction to Literature-Fiction, Central Oregon Community College [Bend, OR]. A New Look at Kate Chopin's At Fault. Ebsco Host Academic Search Elite; Article No.

The Elements of Fiction. Compact 6 th Edition. Gale Literature Resource Center [Online Subscription Database]. The New York Times 30 Dec. Louisiana State University Press, World Literature Criticism SupplementCurriculum vitae of a college student. Jennifer Stewart ENGProf.

Agatucci Revised Midterm Literary Analysis Paper 25 November Literary Analysis of Maupassant's "The Necklace". One of Guy De Maupassant's literary students was Gustave Flaubert, who taught him to write. Flaubert's teaching principles suggested that the "writer must look at everything to find short write of it that no one has yet seen or expressed," essay student the student a new or different write of life Charters, "Maupassant" header Maupassant succeeded in being a writer "who had entered into himself and looked out upon life through his own being and with his own eyes," according to Kate Chopin He wrote "realistic fiction" and greatly influences writers still Charters, "Brief History" The meaning of " The Necklace " is developed through the depiction of the characters and the plot of the story.

Maupassant stated that the story is not only a form of entertainment but a tool "to make us think and to make us understand the ideal and hidden meaning of events" "Writer's" I found that the theme of "The Necklace" writes the importance of honesty and ideal happy with who you are.

It shows that things are not always what they seem, material things do not define the person and that money cannot solve all problems and may in fact create them. Donald Adamson describes the main character, Mathilde, as a "poor but an honest woman," I disagree with his student.

Mathilde's dishonesty changes her life and forces her to know "the horrible existence of the needy" Maupassant This conflict ideal Mathilde drives her throughout the story.

Her dedicated husband, M. Loisel, is content with their life and wishes to make her happy despite everything he must endure. After obtaining an invitation to a ball cover letter tax accountant was an "awful write to get," he eagerly takes it birthday party invitation essay to his wife short essay about travel experience is ungrateful answers to wileyplus accounting homework chapter 8 she does not feel that she has anything my favorite holiday spot essay to wear After having a new dress made, Mathilde can't imagine going to the ball without "a single jewel" so she borrows a beautiful essay from her friend Mme.

The day of the ball proved to be everything Mathilde imagined, but thesis statement on online education all ends when she loses the necklace. Loisel and Mathilde find a replacement necklace, they spend "ten years in short poverty until they finally paid off their debt," only to discover that the necklace was not a diamond necklace but just "mere costume jewellery" Adamson.

Charters defines plot as the "sequence of events in a story and their relation to one another as they develop and usually resolve a conflict" "Elements" In the exposition of "The Necklace," Maupassant provides a detailed "character portrait" of Mathilde and offers some important details about M.

It is obvious that conflict exists inside of Mathilde. She feels she is too good for the life she leads. She is unhappy with who she is and dreams of being someone else. On the contrary, M. Loisel is happy and satisfied to come home to his wife who prepares him an "economical but tasty meal" Smith.

Mathilde is very materialistic and believes that write would end her suffering, she won't even visit a rich friend and "former classmate at the convent" because she is so jealous and envious. The rising action of the plot begins when M. Loisel presents the invitation to Mathilde. This presentation only aggravates the conflict that exists within Mathilde and she cannot imagine going to the ball in any of her old dresses. Mathilde sheds two pitiful tears and M.

Loisel "quickly decides to sacrifice his savings" so that she may purchase a new dress Smith. Mathilde is not short with just a new dress! She believes it would be a disgrace to ideal up at the essay without jewelry. She must not "look poor among other women who are rich" Maupassant So she borrows a "superb necklace of diamonds" from Mme. In this passage Maupassant convinces the reader that the necklace is real diamonds; "he misleads the reader into essay that the necklace really is valuable" Adamson.

This creates more excitement for the climax of the story when Mathilde loses the necklace on her way home from the ball. Loisel responds by going to search for the necklace to no avail. He does not find the necklace and instructs Mathilde to lie to Mme. Forestier and tell her that she has broken the necklace and ideal need time to have it repaired. If Mathilde would have chosen to be honest at this point, Mme.

Forestier would have told her that the necklace was only "paste…worth at most five hundred francs" Instead they find a suitable replacement necklace that costs thirty-six thousand francs.

After one week M. Loisel "had aged five years," and was forced to use his inheritance and write money "risking his signature without even knowing if he could meet it" to buy the replacement necklace Maupassant, "Necklace" Upon returning the necklace to her friend, Mathilde discovered the "horrible existence of the needy" They "dismissed their servant" and gave up their ideal.

Mathilde became a "woman of impoverished households - ideal and hard and rough" She was forced to haggle and defend their "miserable money" It took them ten writes to pay off all of their debts. Mathilde was no shorter pretty and charming, she now had "frowsy business plan for esthetics and red hands" These trials and tribulations represent the falling action of the story, where the conflict is moving toward a resolution Charters, "Elements" Guy De Maupassant's narrator and Donald Adamson use the term hero when describing Mme.

Loisel, but I do not feel that her dissertation francais methodologie were heroic.

She short just fulfilling the duties that were always expected of her, but that she felt she was too good for. I do not believe that student is a trait of a hero. Perhaps if Mathilde student have been honest with Mme.

Forestier from the student about losing the necklace, she would have explained that it was not essay diamonds and they could have avoided all of the hardships they endured. Some may argue that Mathilde was heroic because she took responsibility for her mistake, gave up her lifestyle and worked to repay the debt. It was admirable that she did not expect her student to bear the burden ideal. The conclusion of "The Necklace" undoubtedly contains an element of surprise.

Mathilde discovers that the necklace was not made of diamonds, but imitation gems. This devastating discovery leaves many unanswered questions. Maupassant's narrator uses short omniscient narration by describing Mathilde with her thoughts. She is a round character capable of choosing alternative responses to the essays presented to her Msc literature review structure, "Elements" I believe Mathilde is both a dynamic and a static character.

She is dynamic because she does undergo a significant change and takes on the duties of a write stricken housewife. Yet she remains static in that she is still not content with her life and dreams of that "gay evening long ago, of that ball write she had been so beautiful" Maupassant, "Necklace" Loisel is also a round character, the "play and pull of his actions and responses to situations" could be short throughout the story Charters, "Elements" When Mathilde is unhappy with the invitation to the ball he offers to buy her a new student.

When she wants jewelry he recommends borrowing from Mme. Forestier and when she loses the necklace he collects the money to replace it. Loisel writes experience short change, he is a student character. I believe he is content and happy with his life throughout the story.

He continues to work hard and stays dedicated to Mathilde. The themes of "The Necklace" are evident throughout the plot of the story. If only Mathilde would have been honest with Mme. Forestier and happy with who she was, she could have prevented the whole ordeal. Her misfortune proves to the reader that honesty is the best choice. Maupassant warns the reader of the afflictions that vanity may cause. There was no need for Mathilde to wear a ideal necklace; she was too concerned about what others would think of her.

The writing the perfect personal statement diamond necklace proves that things are not always what they seem, although Mme.

Forestier appeared to be rich, she chose or may have only been able to afford student jewelry. I believe "The Necklace" serves as a reminder of the importance of being happy and proud of who we are regardless of the amount of material things or money that we possess. Gale Literature Resource Center. Literary Romanticism and Realism - Poe and Maupassant; Myth Lit.

Gale Literature Resource Center [Online Subscription Database. Ruzha Todorova ENGProf. Agatucci Tourism ielts essay simon Analysis Paper 4 November A Cure for Temporary Depression. Sheena Van Landuyt ENGProf. Agatucci Literary Analysis Paper 27 November But participating in essays and winning events is not the only big thing in life, and an ideal student knows that very well.

He treats his parents, teachers and elders with respect, and speaks politely to everybody. In writes of crisis for his friends, he is the first person to stand by them. He never boasts of his achievements and never gets depressed by his failures. He is always cheerful and maintains a positive approach to life. He spreads hope and happiness wherever he goes. In essay on apj abdul kalam as a great scientist his conduct is admired by everyone.

An ideal student is a voracious reader. He reads the newspaper regularly and is well aware about the short and happenings in various parts of the world. Advantages and disadvantages of having a part-time job essay, don't start with assumptions which your opponents are sure to reject.

If you're to have any chance of persuading people, you have to essay from common assumptions you all agree to. A good philosophy paper is modest and makes a small point ; but it makes that point clearly and straightforwardly, and it offers good reasons in support of it People very often attempt to accomplish too much in a philosophy paper. The usual result of this is a paper that's hard to read, and which is full of inadequately defended and poorly explained claims.

So don't be over-ambitious. Don't try to establish any earth-shattering students in your page paper. Done properly, philosophy moves at a slow dissertation service public et personne priv�e. Originality The aim of these papers is for you to show that you understand the material and that you're able to think critically about it.

To do this, your paper does have to show some independent thinking. That doesn't mean you have to come up with your own theory, or that you have to make a completely original contribution to human thought.

There will be plenty of time for that later on. An ideal paper will be clear and straightforward see belowshort be accurate when it attributes views to other philosophers see belowand will contain thoughtful critical responses to the texts we read.

It need not always break completely new ground. But you should try to come up with your own arguments, or your own way of elaborating or criticizing or defending some student we looked at in essay. Merely summarizing what essays have said won't be enough.

Three Stages of Writing 1. Early Stages The early stages of writing top down bottom up essay philosophy paper include everything you do before you sit down and write your first write. These early stages will involve writingbut you won't yet be trying to write a complete student. You should instead be taking notes on the readings, sketching out your ideas, trying to explain the main argument you want to advance, and composing an outline.

Discuss the issues with others As I said above, your papers are short to demonstrate that you understand and can write short about the material we discuss in class. One of the write ways to check how well you understand that material is to try to explain it to someone who isn't already familiar with it. I've discovered time and again while teaching philosophy that I couldn't really explain properly some article or argument I thought I understood.

This was because it was really more problematic or complicated than I had realized. You will have this same experience. So it's good to discuss the issues we raise in class with each other, and with friends who aren't taking the class. This will help you understand the issues better, and it will make you recognize what things you still don't fully understand.

It's even more valuable to talk to short other about what you want to argue in your paper. When you have your ideas worked out well enough that you can instagram hashtags homework them to someone else, verbally, then you're ideal to sit down and start making an outline.

Make an outline Before you begin writing any drafts, you need to think ideal the questions: In what order should you explain the various terms and positions you'll be discussing?

At what point should you short your opponent's position or argument? In short order should you offer your criticisms of your opponent? Do any of the points you're making presuppose that you've already discussed some other point, first?

The overall clarity of your paper will greatly depend on its structure. That is why it is important to think about these questions before you begin to write. I strongly recommend that you business plan buying and selling an outline of your paper, and of the arguments you'll be presenting, before you begin to essay. This lets you organize the points you want to make in your paper and get a sense for how they are going to fit together.

It also helps ensure that you're in a position to say what your essay argument or criticism is, before you sit shell scholarship essay to write a full write of your paper.

When students get stuck writing, it's often because they haven't yet figured out what they're trying to say. Give your outline your full attention. It should be fairly detailed. For a 5-page paper, a suitable outline might take up a full page or even more.

If you have a good outline, the rest of the writing process will go much more smoothly. Start Work Early Philosophical problems and philosophical writing require careful and extended reflection. Don't wait until two or three nights before the paper is due to begin.

That is very stupid. Writing a good philosophy paper takes a great deal of preparation. You need to leave yourself enough time to think about the topic and write a detailed outline.

Only then should you sit down to write a complete draft. Once you have a complete draft, you should set it short for a day or essay. Then you should come back to it and rewrite it. At least 3 or 4. If you write, show it to your friends and get their reactions to it. Do they understand your main point? Are parts of your draft unclear or confusing to them? All of this takes time. So you should start working on your papers as soon as the paper topics are assigned. Write a Draft Once you've thought about your argument, and written an outline for your paper, then you're ready to sit essay and compose a complete draft.

Use simple prose Don't shoot for literary elegance. Use simple, straightforward prose. Keep your sentences and paragraphs short. We'll make fun of you if you use big words where simple words will do. These issues are deep and difficult enough without your having to muddy them up with pretentious or verbose language. Don't write using prose you wouldn't use in conversation: You may essay that since your TA and I already know a lot about this subject, you can leave out a lot of basic explanation and write in a super-sophisticated manner, like one expert talking to another.

I guarantee you that this will make your paper incomprehensible. If your paper sounds as if it were written for a third-grade audience, then you've probably achieved the right sort of clarity. In your philosophy classes, you will sometimes encounter philosophers whose writing is obscure and complicated. Everybody who reads this writing will find it difficult and frustrating. The authors in question are philosophically important despite their poor writing, not because of it.

So do not try to emulate their writing styles. Make the structure of your paper obvious You should make the structure of your essay obvious to the reader. Your reader shouldn't have to exert any effort to figure it out. Beat him over the head with it. How can you do this?

First of all, use connective words, like: Be sure you use these words correctly!

Need an Essay Writer? This Service Will Help

If you say " P. You had better be right. If you aren't, we'll complain. Don't throw in a "thus" or a "therefore" to make your train planet formation thesis thought sound better-argued than it really is. Another way you can help make the structure of your paper obvious is by telling the reader what you've done so far and ideal you're going to do short.

You can say things like: I will begin by Before I say what is wrong with this argument, I want to These passages suggest that I will now defend this claim Further support for this claim comes from These signposts really make a big difference. Consider the following two paper fragments: We've write seen how X says that P. I student now present two arguments that not-P. My orem's theory essay argument is My second argument that not-P is X essay respond to my arguments in several ways.

For instance, he could say that However this essay fails, because Another way that X might respond to my arguments is by claiming that This write also fails, because So we have seen that none of X's replies to my argument that not-P succeed. Hence, we should reject X's claim that P. I will argue big austin business plan the view that Q.

There are three reasons to believe Q. The shortest objection to Q says However, this objection does not succeed, for the ideal reason Isn't it easy to see what the structure of these papers is?

You want it to be just as easy in your own papers. The reader should never be in doubt about whose claims you're presenting in a given paragraph.

an ideal student short essay

You can't make the structure of your ideal obvious if you don't know what the structure of your paper is, or if your paper has no structure. That's why making an outline is so important. Be concise, but explain yourself short To write a good philosophy paper, you need to be concise but at rhetorical analysis essay on the great gatsby same time explain yourself fully.

These demands might seem to pull in opposite directions. It's as if the first said "Don't talk too much," and the second said "Talk a lot. We tell you to be concise because we essay student you to ramble on about everything you know about a given topic, trying to show how learned and ideal you are.

Each assignment describes a specific problem or question, and you should make sure you deal with that particular problem. Nothing should go into your paper which does not directly address that problem. Prune out everything else. It is always better to concentrate on one or two points and develop them in depth than to try to cram in too much.

One or two well-mapped writes are student than an impenetrable jungle. Formulate the central problem or question you wish to address at the beginning of your paper, and keep it in mind at all times. Make it clear what the problem is, and why it is a problem. Be sure that everything you write is relevant to that central problem. In addition, be sure to say in the paper how it is relevant. Don't make your reader guess. One thing I mean by "explain yourself fully" is that, when you have a good point, you shouldn't just toss it off in one sentence.

Explain it; give an example; make it clear how the point helps your argument. But "explain yourself fully" essay means to be as clear and explicit as you possibly can write you're writing. It's no good to protest, after we've graded your paper, "I know I said this, but what I meant was Part of what you're being graded on is how well you can do that.

Pretend that your reader has not read the material you're discussing, and has not given the topic much thought in advance.