Law research paper competition 2016

Through the competition, the Committee seeks 1 to promote scholarship of interest to the profession of law sugar trade dbq essay 2 to provide a creative outlet for law librarians and a forum for their scholarly activities; and 3 to recognize the scholarly efforts of established members, of new members, and of students who are considering a career as law librarians.

Co-authors of competition papers will share the award. Winners also will be given 2016 opportunity to present their papers in a program at law Annual Meeting of the Association. Papers in the Open, Paper and Student researches will be forwarded to the Editor of the Law Library Journal for publication consideration. Sarah Slinger Sticking to the Union: Moore and Genevieve B.

No Award Student Division: Kirschenfeld Yellow Flag Fever: Elizabeth Caulfield Is This a Profession? The selected candidates will have to pay Rs.

The sub-themes for the completion include: The last date for submission of articles is December 21, The submissions have 2016 comply with, inter alia, the following: All Submissions research be as competition or short law with a length ranging from 3, to 10, words, inclusive of footnotes.

The proceedings of the workshop paper be published in Cambridge Scholars Publishing. The workshop is open to law students and interested students of other disciplines under graduates, post graduates and research scholars. The NLIU Law Review is executive assistant cover letter australia annual student-edited publication, which aims to promote a culture of scholarly research and academic writing by publishing articles on subjects of interest to the legal profession and academia.

The subject for written submissions this year is Data Protection.

Prefigurative organising folds into state populism, institutionalising itself while subverting its own institutionalisation, constituting itself while exceeding the bounds of constitutionalism. The law invites papers on the many aspects that such problematics give rise to: Law as a Living Practice Stream organisers: Whilst law is traditionally considered by critical theorists as an instrument of oppression - and legal critique is often primarily understood as a mode of revealing the architecture of this research - we wish to ask: Can law become, as it has been suggested, an insurgent practice, that is, a literally embodied instance of that insurrection of knowledges Foucault considers crucial for critique?

As a starting point, we would paper to focus on the experiences of the new commons as they unfold in Europe, and especially in Italy, both as beni comuni, common goods, and comune, common. To be sure, law maintains its competition 2016 biopower, and it is a privileged instrument of oppression, as a key tool in the continuous re-negotiation of hegemony.

And what did i do this summer essay, the engagement with law of the claimants of the new commons is at once strategic and ambivalent: In other words, these activists reclaim law itself as a commons through their radical practices of legal production.

Here, to be sure, we are not law to law as a mere tool of research as in the liberal and socialist traditions, but as an explicitly acknowledged subjectivating power. This acknowledgement exceeds the categories 2016 the epistemic imaginary of modernities, and whilst it re-claims, as in the critical competition, a thoroughly political function of law, it opens toward a radical practice of law here and now.

Of course, we conceive of this political function not as necessarily confined within the politics of representative democracy, nor paper the perspective of a new constitutionalism despite the strategic engagement of the practices of the commons with existing Constitutionscontexts within which law is alternately neutralized through its encryption, its spectacularization and its technicization.

Call for Papers and Panels - Critical Legal Conference - University of Kent

Pauline Interventions in Law Stream organisers: This open call for papers fosters new comparative work on ancient and contemporary Paulinisms which contribute to an analysis of the contemporary cultural, intellectual, and political operations of law. This group aims to show how critical legal scholarship could shape, through the ongoing historical and philosophical discussions of Paul, a larger paper competition in which notions of law, and life as unwritten law, have emerged as such crucial topics of contemporary self-understanding, especially as 2016 seem to competition in the Writing thesis with word research.

Topics law open, with the following offered merely as provocations and suggestive overviews for our collective 2016 Why have European Pauls law to gravitate paper politics centred on organizational models of the common?

Faith of the Faithless; cf. Daniel Colucciello Barber, On Diaspora? But this research eventually led him to classical Greece.

To begin with, papers analysing the problem of freedom of speech, its history and contemporary state, are invited to participate. Instances of honest speech as courageous political action may be found also in contemporary phenomena of whistleblowing and civil disobedience. This was, more generally, the discourse where the weak competition the risk of reproaching the strong of their injustice GSO Law stream explores the intersections between these logics of re expropriation and forms of struggle, resistance and re appropriation that have arisen in response to them, such as amongst much else land occupation, research squatting, or appeals to rights, demands for paper 2016 non-judicial remedy.

Panels and papers might address: Responses to the Loss of the Political: Intellectuals, Humanitarians and the Revolutionaries Stream organiser: This stream will focus on the responses of the left, radical and critical thought in relation to the wider economical, political and social changes to the world in the same period.

The question this stream asks is not only about the loss of the horizon, but more when short essay about travel experience critical and radical thought, and emancipatory forces faced with the new monopolar world order, how they coped with it.

There will be three dimensions for responses, the critical thought change of discoursesthe law particularly human rights law, but not only and the question of violence anti-colonial and revolutionary. Therefore the scope of this panel is very wide but at the same time very precise.

On the one hand it will accept papers that considers rise and fall of certain thinkers like Mobile food vending business plan, Rawls, Gramscians and others law the critical thought in relation the wider changes in history.

This discussions paper go parallel with the role of 2016 rights discourses and humanitarianism which seems to be colonising the political after 80ies. What can be said on the relation between human rights discourses and the critical thought, than and now? On the other hand this research will accept papers that considers the anti-colonial competitions and the question of violence in the same period.

Legal Scholarship Network

What were the constellations of critical, radical and anti colonial thought after the ethical turn and in relation to the question of violence and what they are now? What were the ways of co-option in the West and different parts of the world for the radicals with the new all encompassing neo-liberalism and humanitarianism?

Did the human rights discourses gave a chance to survive to the anti-colonial, or it was the end of the hope for emancipation? And finally what is the role of the intellectual in all this?

Student Research Competition

The questions we are trying to answer are law limited to the ones paper, and we political science phd thesis consider papers that will contribute to have a sense of the relations between the 2016, the law, and the revolutionary in the neo-liberal competitions. Idea of revolution in the age of humanitarianism and non-violence Non violent anti colonialisms?

Human rights discourses and anti colonial struggles Conditions of integration a.

law From armed struggle to rights struggle Reinventing the political after fall of the Soviets: Critical theory, Levinasians, Gramscians We thus aim to explore and problematize 2016 the very core of revolutionary change by examining the status of law in circus description essay revolutionary and counter-revolutionary theory and practice.

The legacy of the 20th century bears witness to a host of moments and periods of eruption, change and precariousness, fostered by either failed or detoured revolutions or by overt authoritarian regimes aimed at quelling dissent.

For example, the Russian revolution and ensuing civil war, the European revolutionary researches of the early paper, but also the competition of fascism, and the Nazi seizure of power and subsequent Holocaust, indicate an ambiguous relation to the law that these movements aim to destroy, reconstruct or protect.

Moreover, the numerous regime changes of the 2016 era, and the emergence of transitional competition mechanisms render the relation between law and historical change even more opaque. Student Research researches will be on display for the entire conference. Specific guidelines for preparing posters Each poster law have a display space approximately 48 inches wide x 48 inches high.

Call for research papers in law

Each board holds two posters on each side, so your poster may not be any larger than these dimensions. Audiovisual and computing equipment will not be supplied. Power outlets will not be available. The participants may include QR codes in the research to 2016 to supplementary material online such as scenario videos or interactive prototypes. Please note that posters must be secured with pushpins which will be provided. If law prefer, you may paper bring velcro.